When Jane Austen was seven, her beget, Cassandra Leigh Austen, lost several foreteeth, which made her look older. One can tell the absence of those teeth in this profile .
Healthy teeth and gums are signs of a good constitution. Throughout her adulthood, Mrs Austen was known for her many ailments. One wonders if there was a association between her poor health and missing tooth. One besides wonders if tooth problems were regarded as small aches and ailments of life, or something more.
Reading: Jane Austen’s World
In fall of 1813, Jane Austen visited her brother Henry in Henrietta Street in London, along with Edward Knight, their older brother and his three daughters, 20 year old Fanny and Lizzy ( 13 ) and Marianne ( 12 ). In two letters to her baby Cassandra, Jane described enjoyable syndicate pastimes and shopping purchases, but her most intense recollections are of two visits to the dentist. Her first report is of an hour-long visit to a dentist named Mr Spence. On September 15, she wrote :
“Going to Mr. Spence’s was a sad business and cost us many tears; unluckily we were obliged to go a second time before he could do more than just look. We went first at half-past twelve and afterwards at three; papa (edward) with us each time; and, alas! we are to go again to-morrow. Lizzy is not finished yet. There have been no teeth taken out, however, nor will be, I believe, but he finds hers in a very bad state, and seems to think particularly ill of their durableness. They have been all cleaned, hers filed, and are to be filed again. There is a very sad hole between two of her front teeth.”
London was obviously filled with a tribe of Mr Spences, all of whom were dentists. Braving the Dentist with Jane Austen conjectures that the individual who treated the Knight girls might be George Spence, dentist to George III. This makes common sense, for Edward Austen Leigh was rich adequate to afford a dentist whose career and a patented stigmatize of tooth powder made him “ affluent enough to buy a area estate at Cranford and to see his sons well educated. ”
The Regency Era was not known for gentle dentistry practices. Jane ’ s letter on the 16th details a agonizing scenario :
“The poor Girls & their Teeth!—I have not mentioned them yet, but we were a whole hour at Spence’s, & Lizzy’s were filed & lamented over again & poor Marianne had two taken out after all, the two just beyond the Eye teeth, to make room for those in front.When her doom was fixed, Fanny Lizzy & I walked into the next room, where we heard each of the two sharp hasty Screams.”
– Fanny’s teeth were cleaned too–& pretty as they are, Spence found something to do to them, putting in gold & talking gravely–& making a considerable point of seeing her again before winter.–He had before urged the expediency of L. & M.s being brought to Town in the course of a couple of Months to be farther examined, & continued to the last to press for their all coming to him.—My Br[other] would not absolutely promise.
—The little girls teeth I can suppose in a critical state, but I think he must be a Lover of Teeth & Money & Mischeif to parade about Fannys. I would not have had him look at mine for a shilling a tooth & double it.—It was a disagreable hour.”
I ’ molarity amazed that Mr Spence ’ second efforts took lone an hour, for in that time he cleaned Fanny ’ sulfur tooth and put in aureate, pulled two of Marianne ’ randomness dentition, and filed Lizzy ’ randomness. I wonder if he gave laudanum ( 10 % opium powder solution in alcohol ) to poor Marianne. Had she taken the tincture it would not have helped her immediately, for she let out two short screams. Relief would come only 15 minutes or so by and by. ( azotic oxide was not broadly used as a alveolar consonant anesthetic until 1844. )
As for filing Lizzy ’ south tooth, this was a common practice at the fourth dimension ( and even today ) to smooth out spotty teeth. This exercise achieved both thoroughly or evil results, for if excessively much of the tooth was filed ( specially in a young person ), the enamel could be significantly thinned in subsequent filings and make the teeth more sensitive. Jane used the words maleficence and disagreeable to remark on Fanny ’ s unnecessary discussion, and decidedly wrote she would not subject herself to Mr Spence ’ second caution .
Daily Dental Hygiene
By the recently eighteenth century, people used a assortment of means to take worry of their teeth : toothpicks made with the quills of goose feathers and toothbrushes created with horsehair or hog ’ s hair. These implements created as many problems as they solved, for they were unsterile and distributed germs while “ cleaning tooth. ”
In Sense & Sensibility, Austen connected toothpicks with privilege. She described Robert Ferrars as he carefully chose a toothpick shell at Gray ’ s jeweler ’ mho in Sackville Street, detaining the Dashwood sisters :
‘At last the affair was decided. The ivory, the gold, and the pearls, all received their appointment; and the gentleman having named the last day on which his existence could be continued without the possession of the toothpick-case, drew on his gloves with leisurely care and … walked off with a happy air of real conceit and affected indifference’.
The jewelry denounce on Sackville Street, near Regent Street, was likely well known to Jane, who frequently visited her buddy Henry in central London. This scene is a admonisher to Austen ’ randomness contemporaries that implements for dental hygiene, although low-cost for the amphetamine and middle classes, were unaffordable to the poor, who had to make do with whatever was at hand, such as pop ash ( lake brine or naturally occur mineral deposits ) or salt. Both were clean products .
The toothpaste of that era or tooth powders were besides baffling. Ian Mortimer lists a recipe in his koran for white tooth powder : 60oz chalk, ½oz of cassia gunpowder and 1oz of orrisroot root. * other recipes included powderize charcoal, brick or strategic arms limitation talks. All could destroy tooth enamel .
Austen described the effects of Harriet Smith ’ s tooth extractions in Emma:
“Pretty little Harriet Smith was usually the most cheerful, happy natured young lady, but just now she was leaning on the sofa in a despondent, listless posture, and not seeming to even notice Isabella’s five children, who were romping at their feet, in various states of frisk and noise. As Harriet normally loved to play with the children, and made herself the most useful guest possible, Isabella ventured a question.
“Miss Smith – may I ask? Are you in pain – are your teeth hurting still?”
Harriet roused herself to smile and demur. “Oh! no, Mrs. Knightley, I do assure you. The tooth-pulling was hard, I cannot deny; but you know it is better when it is all over, and I have felt no bad sensations now for at least a week.”
Emma had arranged for Harriet to stay with her sister Isabella’s family in London, in order to consult the best dentist, as there were wisdom teeth to remove. If any wry thought, that the extraction of any part of Harriet’s wisdom might be to her detriment came to her mind, Emma did not venture on that bon mot to anybody. She was trying to become a kinder person, and in the first rapture of her engagement with Mr. Knightley she was beginning to feel that it might not be altogether difficult to achieve.”
This scene accurately described the after effects of wisdom of solomon tooth extraction, which must have been quite irritating. The prefer extraction legal document, called a tooth or dental key, frequently caused gingiva damage or even a fracture call on the carpet. Jane contrasted Harriet ’ s fresh acquiescent nature against Emma ’ south exalted impression of herself, even while she strove to become a kind and more compassionate person. The reader senses in this enactment that Emma ’ sulfur improvement took conscious attempt and did not come at all naturally .
It is significant that Emma sent Harriet to her sister ’ sulfur house in London for the tooth extractions. In town, she would receive the services of a dentist. Barbers besides pulled teeth in cities. The rural populace might visit the blacksmith, or, as in this 1823 Rowlandson print under, a greenwich village practitioner. One imagines that to dull the pain, patients imbibed laudanum or ample amounts of alcohol before submitting themselves to the procedure. The instrumental role used until the deep nineteenth century was called a dental key .
Read more : Top 11 free live chat solution in 2022
Thomas Rowlandson | The Tooth-Ache, or, Torment & Torture | The Metropolitan Museum of Art
A woman, who has called upon a village practitioner for a toothache, sits in a chair at center, while he places his finger in her mouth. His assistant brings him a pair of horse pliers at left. Another woman waits in the background at left, clenching her mouth in agony.
By the end of the nineteenth century dental forceps were developed and replaced the key. The improved instruments were less likely to do major damage to gums or jaws .
Emma ’ randomness refer for Harriet is affecting, as is Austen ’ mho description of her three nieces under Mr Spence ’ s ministrations. Upper and in-between class ladies treasured white teeth and fresh hint, which in an long time of hapless alveolar consonant hygiene was quite a brash goal. Ladies who belong to the upper stratum of company could afford sugar, whose costs were out of range for the lower classes. interestingly, they had healthier teeth than their betters. ( queen Elizabeth I ’ second teeth were black from the sweets she loved to eat. Her teeth rotted. After losing indeed many, listeners were hard put to understand her manner of speaking. )
In ancient cultures, chew sticks in the form of thin twigs whose ends were frayed were used to clean teeth and gums by rubbing them. early ways to clean teeth were to use tooth cloths, sponges, and fingers dipped in alcohol. tongue scrapers, a man of licorice, red gum leaves, cloves, cinnamon, salt water system rinses, and apple cider vinegar were natural means for bad breath command .
Unlike George Washington in the United States, Jane ’ s mother did not wear dentures. During this meter artificial teeth were acquired in a number of ways.
The battle of Waterloo was a watershed here and now in more ways than the loss of the french on the battlefield. artificial teeth were expensive. The 47,000 unseasoned men who died had healthy teeth and were impertinently dead. This sounds atrocious, but the treasure trove of about perfect teeth for dentures, pulled out by the men who combed through the bodies to find tooth to sell, was morbid to say the least.
besides known as grave robbers, resurrection men dug bodies up in cemeteries. deplorable to say, the corpses were not clean or uniformly young, and thus provided teeth that were not of premium timbre and could spread disease and infection.
“Donations” from Slaves or the Poor
Worse than grave robbery was the purchase of healthy teeth and pulling them from the mouths of the desperate and powerless. Slaves in the east and west Indies had no choice, but neither had the athirst poor who needed the money to feed their starved families or themselves. These teeth were the “ fresh. ”
The pilfer or so called buy teeth were set into dentures or into the holes left by educe teeth. Fresh and goodly human teeth were preferred, of course, but cow and horse teeth were besides used, as were expensive french porcelain teeth made to ordain for the full-bodied. natural materials included tusks. All dentures created from these mediums were for the full-bodied only. They ironically had the worst teeth due to their sugary diets .
In addition, the dentures were often made with lead, whose behind poison bearing caused irreversible price to brains or kidneys. Hygiene was practically nonexistent and dentures were rarely cleaned. Those made of wood rotted inside the mouth and the malodor of bacteria forming under them must have been overpowering. Women who valued clean hint must have gone from one embarrassment to another. possibly Mrs Austen ’ second choice to live her life without upper dentures was a wise one .
Improvements in dentistry kept quickly with inventions and scientific advances. The need for oral surgery in the general populace attracted dentists, apprentices, oral surgeons, and apothecaries. The possibility of generating a good income in cities, towns, and the countryside on rotting tooth seemed endless .
Tooth brushes improved equally well. They were first mass produced in the 1780s, but did not trickle down to the lower classes until they became low-cost .
development of Toothbrush | Download Scientific Diagram
file : Napoleon ’ s soup-strainer, deoxycytidine monophosphate 1795. ( 9660576547 ) .jpg – Wikimedia Commons
By 1820, advances in tooth powders had reduced their abrasive choice. These tooth powders were homemade or purchased from an pharmacist, and placed in jars or boxes. finally they became a spread that was more effective in clean and protecting teeth and tasted good deoxyadenosine monophosphate well. The collapsible toothpaste tube, invented by Dr Washington Sheffield, appeared in the 1880s.
Read more : Top 3 pci compliance scan tool free in 2022
By the mid-19th hundred, dental practices were strikingly less painful due to the application of azotic oxide, which for a time fueled laughing gas parties for the fat. once that fad faded, the gas turned out to be a fantastic invention for medical applications. Thomas Beddoes, an english doctor conducted experiments on the therapeutic properties of the accelerator, and James Watts, he of steam locomotive fame, invented a way to deliver it to patients more efficiently. Humphry Davy used himself as a guinea hog and tested the enjoyable sensation he felt while inhaling the gas. Poet Robert Southey wrote that “ Davy has actually invented a new pleasure for which linguistic process has no mention. ”
While this tilt of resources is extensive, the information is fascinating !